It's All In Who You Know

   Finding a job can be the hardest thing of all, but then sometimes, in just 5 weeks, a person can find their dream job. While looking for a non-profit blogger, I stumbled upon what I think to be the perfect match for me in this assignment. Josh Gold has been writing his Nonprofit Gold blog for six years and just recently got a job with a nonprofit organization. Not only is this convenient for me to find someone who knows and writes about the subject, but while looking for him, I found this article as well.

   

   Five week networking is what it took for Josh, aided by his 'career coach' to get connections, put out applications, take on the interviews and land his dream job. What did it take? Making connections, listing off the connections you have for whatever area, in this case, non-profit. After you list your connections, you ask them for a meeting, try to get more connections from them and then follow up with both a written and face-to-face thank you. That's all it takes--at least that what worked for him. I couldn't help but notice, though, that this is exactly what we're being taught to do for beat reporting. 

   Having connections seems to be the most important thing in life. You can get ahead so easily by just knowing the right people, and in the end, it can really pay off. In order to be a successful beat reporter--no matter the beat--you must go to the people you have already met as well as secure multiple new sources to gain new information. The easiest way to get more sources is to ask the ones you already have to shoot a couple names your way, and that's when the true networking starts. If you're lucky, all of the sources will cooperate with you and give helpful information, but if not, try to keep reliable sources on hand if others fall through. With these tools and skills, there's no way a person can truly fail. It just may take some time to find your flow, but once you do, it's likely unstoppable. 

Rescued: One Farm at a Time

There are a lot of non-profit organizations out in the world...I mean a lot! Even when we don't realize it, there could be 5 in your town alone. While I was looking for news about non-profits, I stumbled upon an interesting story about a non-profit from Jamestown, ND. I wasn't expecting to find news so close to home, but I'm glad I did.

Walmart is a huge contributor for many organizations and even events, it's even a sponsor for a local non-profit organization called Farm Rescue. Farm Rescue prides itself on being a one-of-a-kind organization that helps farmers plant and harvest after major disasters, injury or illness. The organization is based out of Jamestown and has just received a donation from the Walmart Foundation. Walmart gave two grants out, both totaling $78,000, from both the North Dakota and Iowa Walmart Giving Programs. Bill Gross, founder of Farm Rescue, is happy about the donation and says that Walmart has donated $300,000 to the organizations mission since starting the program in 2005.

Though a small organization, Farm Rescue has helped more than 200 families in 7 years spreading throughout the states of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Minnesota and Iowa. The organization is even active in the world of social media. Updates can be found at their website: www.farmrescue.org or on Facebook.

Up In Smoke

   In today's society, so many things are taboo are often in the center of heated discussion. Possibly one of the most talked about issue is smoking; who can do it and where. Though underage smoking still continues to be a problem in Minnesota and North Dakota, what is getting more attention recently is smoking bans in public areas, especially bars; and this is definately causing controversy...especially in the theater world.
   Maybe we haven't seen it ourselves, but the theater breaks many boundaries to make plays more authentic, like smoking on stage. This issue has been called to attention in St. Paul, MN and is becoming out-lawed. Like most issues; no matter where; there are two sides of the arguement. The real question is: which side is right, or is there a right side?
   North Dakota just recently passed the smoking ban law, but Minnesota passed the law of no smoking in bars in 2007. Both sides of the arguement are valid, however. It is said that if smokers can't blow smoke in bars, why should they be able to inside the theater. On the other hand, smoking adds authenticity and realism to theater productions, which makes theater so impressive. Others tend to disagree, thinking the act isn't necessary to get the full effect.
   What do you think? If you were to attend a play that called for smoking, would you be upset or understanding? More importantly, what if you were pre-warned. That's what the law says is permittable in Minnesota. As long as the audience is notified before the performance, smoking is allowed. Shouldn't that be enough to make the event acceptable. If viewers are interested in seeing that performance, they already know there is smoking and could accept the fact; especially if they are themselves smokers. To be honest, I don't find it to be a problem, it's just something I'm used to. Then again, what makes the theater so special? Is there anything that makes them above the law? We all have to follow the laws, right? As they say in the show biz...the show must go on! Even if it is without a smoke filled room.

--Government/Legislative beat (For the digital and non-digital age)
http://journomel.com/2012/09/26/beat-reporting-in-the-digital-age/

Getting Schooled

   We all know that college is what we're supposed to do when we grow up. It's programmed into us as children: graduate high school and go to a good college or university so you can get a great paying job when you graduate. That all sounds fine, but in reality, that's not how it works. Why? Most of us can't afford to get a higher education; whether we want to or not, and it's starting to show across the country.

   There are many reasons for kids not to go to college: work, family, military and the biggest one of all...lack of money. Our economy today and since 2008 has grown increasingly worse and it also looks bleak for our future, and this is making life difficult to even shop for groceries, let alone spring for fall tuition. According to an article in the New York Times, this decline is being seen in both public and private colleges, and is more noticeable in Midwest and Northern public and graduate schools because there are lower numbers of high school seniors.

   What seems to be the trend is slight decreases in numbers, but in the end, numbers are staying flat, but could easily drop drastically in the future. One example from Dartmouth shows that the number of early applicants has declined but seems to be too early to tell for sure what the future will show for numbers, but seems that the numbers will flat line for the time being. 

   A question to ask, though, is what makes the difference? Does it matter the location or size of school or the cost of tuition? We all know the reputation that we keep here at VCSU. Small numbers in students and also in tuition...could that be the reason our numbers continue to rise, or will we fall to the economic woes that the country faces every day? 

   As a college student, I struggle with the facts often. I don't like school enough to go, but what would I do if I didn't attend classes? I don't want to work a full time job that I dislike, will going to school and getting a degree really get me a well paid job once I graduate? The biggest question of all is: how am I going to pay for all of this?! Especially if I don't get the high paying dream job. These aren't easy questions to deal with, but we must. Each individual must decide whether they're right for higher education, but one thing is for sure. Do your homework before you pick the right college for your future.